PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Data-driven models and comparison for correlation of pharmaceutical solubility in supercritical solvent based on pressure and temperature as inputs

Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, ISSN: 2214-157X, Vol: 49, Page: 103236
2023
  • 3
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 3
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    3
    • Citation Indexes
      3
  • Captures
    3
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • 1

Most Recent News

Reports from Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Add New Data to Research in Information Technology (Data-driven models and comparison for correlation of pharmaceutical solubility in supercritical solvent based on pressure and temperature as ...)

2023 SEP 12 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Drug Daily -- Fresh data on information technology are presented in a

Article Description

Data-driven models were employed for the solubility correlation, while the focus was on modeling the solubility of raloxifene drug and density of carbon dioxide based on temperature (T) and pressure (P) inputs. Three Machine Learning models, namely Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR), and LASSO regression, were employed and optimized using the MPHPT method for hyper-parameter tuning. The dataset consisted of experimental measurements of solubility ( y ), and CO 2 density. For the prediction of density, the MLP model exhibited excellent performance with an R 2 score of 0.99726, demonstrating a significant level of association between the anticipated and observed values. The mean squared error (MSE) was 9.8721E+01, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 1.78565E-02, and the maximum error was 1.86395E+01. The LASSO and BRR models achieved slightly lower accuracy, with R 2 scores of 0.83317 and 0.83001, respectively. Regarding the solubility of the raloxifene drug, the MLP model demonstrated a strong predictive capability with an R 2 score of 0.99343. The MSE was 3.0869E-02, MAPE was 4.02666E-02, and the maximum error was 3.01133E-01. The LASSO and BRR models also provided reasonable predictions, with R 2 scores of 0.90955 and 0.8891, respectively. However, they exhibited higher MSEs and MAPEs compared to the MLP model.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know