PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Clinical validation of the iXip index in avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsy: Results from a prospective multicenter study involving 426 patients

Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, ISSN: 2468-2942, Vol: 10, Page: 40-45
2017
  • 8
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 6
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of iXip, a novel biomarker for prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy based on an algorithm including patient age, prostate volume, PSA and PSA-IgM levels,. This was a prospective multicenter study involving 426 consecutive men undergoing initial prostate biopsy with at least 12 cores in a real-life clinical setting. Diagnostic accuracy of iXip for prostate cancer detection was calculated with AUC and compared to that of prostate volume, PSA and PSA-IgM levels. The correlation of iXip with tumor aggressiveness, defined as any cancer with Gleason score ≥7, was evaluated by Spearman ρ coefficient analysis. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 193/426 patients (45%), of which 65 (35%) had Gleason score ≥7. iXip values were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer (median value 55% vs. 39%, p<0.001). iXip was the most accurate predictor of cancer (AUC=0.711), followed by prostate volume (AUC=0.660) and PSA level (AUC=0.543). By setting iXip cut-off at 20%, no patients with iXip values below the cut-off were diagnosed with cancer, resulting in a 5.6% (24/426) reduction of unnecessary prostate biopsies. A significant correlation between iXip values and Gleason score was observed (ρ=0.347; p<0.001). Our prospective multicenter study suggests that the novel biomarker iXip may be used with a 20% cut-off value in order to reduce the proportion of prostate biopsies by approximately 5%, without missing a single case of cancer. Moreover, higher iXip values are significantly correlated with tumor aggressiveness.

Bibliographic Details

Andrea Gallotta; Gianluca Giannarini; Lucio Laurini; Danilo Zani; Antonio Garbeglio; Stefano Guazzieri; Mario Plebani; Giorgio Fassina; Filiberto Zattoni

Elsevier BV

Medicine; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know