Gene-expression signatures to inform neoadjuvant treatment decision in HR+/HER2− breast cancer: Available evidence and clinical implications
Cancer Treatment Reviews, ISSN: 0305-7372, Vol: 102, Page: 102323
2022
- 23Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef1
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Review Description
Over the last few years, the indication for chemotherapy use in HR+/HER2− early BC has been significantly modified by the introduction of gene-expression profiling. In the adjuvant setting, several gene-expression signatures have been validated to discriminate early stage HR+/HER2− BC with different prognosis and to identify patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy can be spared. Considering their ability to optimize the choice of adjuvant treatment and the increasing use of neoadjuvant approach in early BC, the potential use of gene-expression signatures to discriminate patients to be candidate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine treatment appears particularly appealing. Indeed, the San Gallen Consensus Conference panel recently endorsed the use of genomic assays on core biopsies as a potential strategy for choosing the type of neoadjuvant treatment (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) in selected patients. In this context, we here review evidence supporting the use of most common commercially available gene-expression signatures (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, PAM50, EndoPredict and Breast Cancer Index) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2− BC. Data on the association of gene expression signatures and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy will be reviewed and the clinical implications of this data to guide the clinical decision-making process in early HR+/HER2− BC will be discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737221001717; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102323; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120739167&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34896969; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305737221001717; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102323
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know