Reconfiguration of a Multi-oscillator Network by Light in the Drosophila Circadian Clock
Current Biology, ISSN: 0960-9822, Vol: 28, Issue: 13, Page: 2007-2017.e4
2018
- 60Citations
- 24Usage
- 90Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations60
- Citation Indexes60
- 60
- CrossRef44
- Usage24
- Abstract Views24
- Captures90
- Readers90
- 90
Article Description
The brain clock that drives circadian rhythms of locomotor activity relies on a multi-oscillator neuronal network. In addition to synchronizing the clock with day-night cycles, light also reformats the clock-driven daily activity pattern. How changes in lighting conditions modify the contribution of the different oscillators to remodel the daily activity pattern remains largely unknown. Our data in Drosophila indicate that light readjusts the interactions between oscillators through two different modes. We show that a morning s-LNv > DN1p circuit works in series, whereas two parallel evening circuits are contributed by LNds and other DN1ps. Based on the photic context, the master pacemaker in the s-LNv neurons swaps its enslaved partner-oscillator—LNd in the presence of light or DN1p in the absence of light—to always link up with the most influential phase-determining oscillator. When exposure to light further increases, the light-activated LNd pacemaker becomes independent by decoupling from the s-LNvs. The calibration of coupling by light is layered on a clock-independent network interaction wherein light upregulates the expression of the PDF neuropeptide in the s-LNvs, which inhibits the behavioral output of the DN1p evening oscillator. Thus, light modifies inter-oscillator coupling and clock-independent output-gating to achieve flexibility in the network. It is likely that the light-induced changes in the Drosophila brain circadian network could reveal general principles of adapting to varying environmental cues in any neuronal multi-oscillator system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982218305360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.064; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048085999&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910074; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960982218305360; https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/neurobiology_pp/226; https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1226&context=neurobiology_pp; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.064
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know