Distinction between consecutive construction phases by combined microscopic study and quantitative pore space analysis: Case study of Horn's Bastion, Riga Castle (Latvia)
Journal of Cultural Heritage, ISSN: 1296-2074, Vol: 57, Page: 88-96
2022
- 3Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A combination of quantitative microscopy (petrographic image analysis) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (pore space textural analysis) allowed for a clear distinction of natural stone and mortar samples from two separate construction periods of the Riga Castle (Latvia) in the 13th and 14th c. For the task of the separation of construction phases, pore space textural characteristics seem to be superior over qualitative (descriptive) characteristics of the rock fabrics of natural building stone – dolostone, whilst quantitative microstructural data (grain size characteristics) are more useful than pore space textural characterisation of mortars.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207422001200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.08.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135814132&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1296207422001200; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.08.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know