Objective Gait Analysis: Review and Clinical Applications
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, ISSN: 0195-5616, Vol: 52, Issue: 4, Page: 857-867
2022
- 4Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Review Description
Objective kinetic and kinematic data can be used as an objective measure of treatment intervention over time but can also be used to evaluate progress of clinical patients. Force plate and pressure sensitive walkway systems both offer the clinician the ability to obtain useful kinetic data, whereas additional equipment is required to obtain kinematic data. Which system is preferred depends on what specific data the researcher or clinician hopes to acquire; both are accurate and consistent, and each offers pros and cons compared with the other that must be considered.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195561622000389; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2022.03.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130319412&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35562214; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195561622000389; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2022.03.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know