3D models of lithic artefacts: A test on their efficacy
Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, ISSN: 2212-0548, Vol: 30, Page: e00279
2023
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Digital recording methods for analytical purposes in archaeology have since a few years entered a more mature phase, which includes the definition and standardisation of work processes and protocols, thus allowing the re-use of a given work routine by other research teams and colleagues. In this paper, we shortly describe the work done within the DISAPALE project and more specifically we focus on the usability of 3D models of lithic artefacts for basic typo-technological assessments. To do that, we asked two testers to independently perform a series of analysis, only based on the 3D models of selected artefacts and relying on open-source software, in conditions generally harder than the usual (where contextual information on the provenience of the artefacts or the chronological attribution are usually available). The obtained results – with the two testers able to remotely identify, measure and analyse most of the lithic artefacts – have shown the potential of a larger diffusion and circulation of 3D models, as well as their limits, especially when interacting with models alone. digital methods, lithic artefacts, typology, technology, 3D, blind test.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212054823000243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00279; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85163821095&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212054823000243; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00279
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know