Design considerations for next-generation sorbent-based atmospheric water-harvesting devices
Device, ISSN: 2666-9986, Vol: 1, Issue: 2, Page: 100052
2023
- 14Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
To meet the increasing global demand for clean water, sorbent-based atmospheric water harvesting (SAWH) is a promising solution. Improving sorbent and device design is essential to enable substantial enhancement of the system’s performance, but challenges remain, owing to the complexity of system integration. Prior work has largely focused on development of sorbent materials deployed in laboratory-scale systems to produce small amounts of water. However, the challenge of large-scale water production remains, falling largely on device-level design and optimization to efficiently utilize sorbent materials in a variety of environments. Here, we present comprehensive design considerations for next-generation SAWH devices, focusing on key components influencing system performance metrics. Various aspects of device design are considered, including sorbent selection and integration, airflow, heating sources, and condensation stages. In addition, we propose several figures of merit to unify sorbent and device development and provide a framework for objectively evaluating the performance of next-generation SAWH devices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666998623000765; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.device.2023.100052; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85172995066&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666998623000765; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.device.2023.100052
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know