Healthcare provider perceptions of accessible exam tables in primary care: Implementation and benefits to patients with and without disabilities
Disability and Health Journal, ISSN: 1936-6574, Vol: 11, Issue: 1, Page: 155-160
2018
- 9Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef7
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 80
Article Description
Recent healthcare mandates require availability of accessible medical exam equipment, which may reduce barriers to care for patients with disabilities (PWD). However, more research is needed to explore healthcare provider views on implementation and routine use of accessible equipment. This study qualitatively explored healthcare provider perceptions of: (1) daily use of accessible medical examination tables with PWD; and (2) recommendations for addressing challenges to using this equipment. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with physicians, nurse practitioners and registered nurses at a clinic where accessible examination tables were recently implemented in all clinic rooms. Data were coded and thematically analyzed by two researchers trained in qualitative methods. A total of 17 providers participated in focus groups or interviews. Participants were mostly female (82%; N = 14), and registered nurses (47%; N = 8), but also included nurse practitioners (29.4%; N = 5), and physicians (23%; N = 4). Common themes were: (1) Ease of use and functionality of tables; and (2) Challenges with use and available training. Overall, providers reported satisfaction with the tables' ability to accommodate patients who are PWD, although they expressed challenges with functionally using the tables with specific populations, such as pediatric patients. Healthcare organizations seeking to implement height-adjustable tables should account for structural requirements of the height-adjustable tables (e.g. accommodating clearance needed when planning room sizes). Practical recommendations and policies for integrating height-adjustable tables into routine clinical care are needed to ensure equitable care for PWD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657417300766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85018675354&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28456614; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1936657417300766; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know