Global and country-level data of the biodiversity footprints of 175 crops and pasture
Data in Brief, ISSN: 2352-3409, Vol: 36, Page: 106982
2021
- 5Citations
- 30Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Eating to save nature? Embrace potatoes, ditch meat and track your beans
Biodiversity-conscious eaters could consider substituting potatoes for rice, cutting down on beef and lamb and asking where their beans, lentils and chickpeas are grown to
Dataset Description
The destruction of natural habitat for cropland and pasture represents a major threat to global biodiversity. Despite widespread societal concern about biodiversity loss associated with food production, consumer access to quantitative estimates of the impact of crop production on the world's species has been very limited compared to assessments of other environmental variables such as greenhouse gas emissions or water use. Here, we present a consistent dataset of the biodiversity footprints of pasture and 175 crops at the global and national level. The data were generated by combining maps of the global distribution of agricultural areas in the year 2000 with spatially explicit estimates of the biodiversity loss associated with the conversion of natural habitat to farmland. Estimates were derived for three common alternative measures of biodiversity – species richness, threatened species richness, and range rarity – of the world's mammals, birds, and amphibians. Our dataset provides important quantitative information for food consumers and policy makers, allowing them to take evidence-based decisions to reduce the biodiversity footprint of global food production.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340921002663; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.106982; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103706635&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889689; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352340921002663; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.106982
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know