Data on the solution and processing time reached when constructing a phylogenetic tree using a quantum-inspired computer
Data in Brief, ISSN: 2352-3409, Vol: 47, Page: 108970
2023
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures4
- Readers4
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Waseda University Researchers Have Provided New Study Findings on Science and Technology (Data on the solution and processing time reached when constructing a phylogenetic tree using a quantum-inspired computer)
2023 APR 06 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Science Daily -- New research on science and technology is the subject
Dataset Description
Phylogenetic trees provide insight into the evolutionary trajectories of species and molecules. However, because (2n-5)! Phylogenetic trees can be constructed from a dataset containing n sequences, but this method of phylogenetic tree construction is not ideal from the viewpoint of a combinatorial explosion to determine the optimal tree using brute force. Therefore, we developed a method for constructing a phylogenetic tree using a Fujitsu Digital Annealer, a quantum-inspired computer that solves combinatorial optimization problems at a high speed. Specifically, phylogenetic trees are generated by repeating the process of partitioning a set of sequences into two parts ( i.e., the graph-cut problem). Here, the optimality of the solution (normalized cut value) obtained by the proposed method was compared with the existing methods using simulated and real data. The simulation dataset contained 32–3200 sequences, and the average branch length according to a normal distribution or the Yule model ranged from 0.125 to 0.750, covering a wide range of sequence diversity. In addition, the statistical information of the dataset is described in terms of two indices: transitivity and average p-distance. As phylogenetic tree construction methods are expected to continue to improve, we believe that this dataset can be used as a reference for comparison and confirmation of the validity of the results. Further interpretation of these analyses is explained in W. Onodera, N. Hara, S. Aoki, T. Asahi, N. Sawamura, Phylogenetic tree reconstruction via graph cut presented using a quantum-inspired computer, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 178 (2023) 107636.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923000884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108970; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148537233&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875213; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352340923000884; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108970
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know