Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: Current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, ISSN: 2211-5684, Vol: 104, Issue: 6, Page: 269-274
2023
- 236Citations
- 362Captures
- 6Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations236
- Citation Indexes235
- 235
- CrossRef145
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures362
- Readers362
- 362
- Mentions6
- News Mentions6
- 6
Most Recent News
La falsification d’images médicales numériques est possible avec un simple smartphone
Il est devenu facile de manipuler, à l’aide de l’intelligence artificielle générative, des clichés cérébraux. A terme, cette pratique pourrait ouvrir la voie à la modification d’articles scientifiques ou de dossiers médicaux, jusqu’à malmener l’intégrité des données d’un hôpital.
Article Description
Artificial intelligence has demonstrated utility and is increasingly being used in the field of radiology. The use of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)-based models has the potential to revolutionize the field of radiology, offering new possibilities for improving accuracy, efficiency, and patient outcome. Current applications of GPT-based models in radiology include report generation, educational support, clinical decision support, patient communication, and data analysis. As these models continue to advance and improve, it is likely that more innovative uses for GPT-based models in the field of radiology at large will be developed, further enhancing the role of technology in the diagnostic process. ChatGPT is a variant of GPT that is specifically fine-tuned for conversational language understanding and generation. This article reports some answers provided by ChatGPT to various questions that radiologists may have regarding ChatGPT and identifies the potential benefits ChatGPT may offer in their daily practice but also current limitations. Similar to other applications of artificial intelligence in the field of imaging, further formal validation of ChatGPT is required.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221156842300027X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149756697&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858933; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221156842300027X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know