Altered muscle development and expression of the insulin-like growth factor system in growth retarded fetal pigs
Domestic Animal Endocrinology, ISSN: 0739-7240, Vol: 32, Issue: 3, Page: 167-177
2007
- 44Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef30
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
We have used a porcine model of spontaneous differential fetal growth to investigate the effects of fetal size on muscle development. We hypothesized that altered muscle development may occur in small fetuses as a consequence of modified expression of selected genes of the insulin-like growth factor system. We examined the development of the Longissimus muscle (m. Longissimus) in small fetuses and their average sized littermates. We collected small for gestational age fetuses and their average sized sibling on days 45, 65 and 100 of gestation (term is 113–116 days). Small fetuses had significantly lower body weight at all three stages of gestation ( p < 0.05) and significantly reduced secondary to primary muscle fibre ratio in m. Longissimus on day 100 ( p < 0.05) compared to their littermates. On day 65, the expression of insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 were significantly higher ( p < 0.05) in m. Longissimus of the small fetuses compared with their average sized littermates. On day 100, the expression of insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 remained significantly higher ( p = 0.001), in addition to significantly higher levels of insulin-like growth factor receptor 2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 in the small fetuses ( p < 0.05). No difference in levels of myogenin was observed between the small and average sized littermates. In conclusion, we demonstrate that reduced fetal muscle development is associated with an increased expression of several genes of the insulin-like growth factor system in small fetuses in mid to late gestation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739724006000312; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.02.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846924263&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16564666; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0739724006000312; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.02.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know