Geographical expansion of Northeast Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) in the Nordic Seas from 2007 to 2016 was primarily driven by stock size and constrained by low temperatures
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, ISSN: 0967-0645, Vol: 159, Page: 152-168
2019
- 72Citations
- 118Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Midnight Sun Could Keep Predatory Fish Out of the Arctic
As the world gets hotter and the oceans warm, many marine species are shifting their ranges to higher latitudes. This has some researchers worried that new fish populations in polar waters might wreak havoc on food webs. But there’s one thing that could stop some of these polar migrators: light. Tiny crustaceans called copepods are at the foundation of many marine food webs around the world. In th
Article Description
In the mid-2000s, summer feeding distribution of Northeast Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) in Nordic Seas began expanding into new areas. The present study explores how spawning stock biomass (SSB) and environmental conditions influenced this expansion using data from scientific surveys conducted in Nordic Seas from 1997 to 2016. During that period mackerel distribution range increased three-fold and the centre-of-gravity shifted westward by 1650 km and northward by 400 km. Distribution range peaked in 2014 and was positively correlated to SSB. Mackerel was present in temperatures ranging from 5 °C to 15 °C, but preferred areas with temperatures between 9 °C and 13 °C according to univariate quotient analysis. Generalized additive models showed that both mackerel occurrence and density were positively related to location, ambient temperature, mesozooplankton density and SSB, explaining 47% and 32% of deviance, respectively. Mackerel relative mean weight-at-length was positively related to location, day-of-year, temperature and SSB, but not with mesozooplankton density, explaining 40% of the deviance. We conclude that geographical expansion of mackerel during the summer feeding season in Nordic Seas was driven by increasing mackerel stock size and constrained by availability of preferred temperature and abundance of mesozooplankton. Marine climate with multidecadal variability probably impacted the observed distributional changes but were not evaluated. Our results were limited to the direct effects of temperature, mesozooplankton abundance, and SSB on distribution range during the last two decades and should be viewed as such.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096706451730259X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.05.023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048190434&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096706451730259X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S096706451730259X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S096706451730259X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.05.023
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know