A review of the land snail faunas of the European Cenozoic – composition, diversity and turnovers
Earth-Science Reviews, ISSN: 0012-8252, Vol: 217, Page: 103610
2021
- 15Citations
- 18Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
We present a critical review of the fossil record of Cenozoic terrestrial gastropods of Europe utilizing a literature-based dataset comprising 1640 species from 609 sites. Net diversity (expressed as species, genus and family richness) and β-diversity (as species, genus and family turnover) reveal several major disruptive phases. Turnovers occurred at the Ypresian–Lutetian and Eocene–Oligocene boundaries, and extinction events took place at the Oligocene–Miocene, Burdigalian–Langhian and Pliocene–Pleistocene boundaries. These biotic shifts correlate largely with global climatic events such as the Ypresian–Lutetian transition from Hothouse to Warmhouse, the Oi-1 glaciation at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary and with the onset of the Pleistocene glacials at the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary. Phases of diversification during the Lutetian, Burdigalian and Pliocene seem to be linked to phases of relative climate stability. At least five immigration events are reflected by the appearance of exotic elements in European faunas during the Ypresian, Bartonian, Rupelian, Burdigalian and Langhian. Many of them correlate with the formation of terrestrial pathways and major migration events in mammals. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the stratigraphic ranges of families and genera in the European fossil record and discuss the timing of the first appearances of extant genera and species, setting important constraints for future molecular phylogenies. Pfefferiola nov. nom. pro Oppenheimiella Pfeffer, 1930, non Meunier, 1893, Hochheimia nov. nom. pro Palaeotrichia Nordsieck, 2014, non Guinot, 1976 and “Gibbulinella ” sandbergeri nov. nom. pro Pupa simplex Sandberger, 1870, non Gould, 1840 are introduced as new replacement names.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825221001100; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103610; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104423343&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012825221001100; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103610
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know