Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of RSV infant and maternal immunization programs: A case study of Nunavik, Canada
eClinicalMedicine, ISSN: 2589-5370, Vol: 41, Page: 101141
2021
- 24Citations
- 56Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef6
- Policy Citations6
- Policy Citation6
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Antibody therapies set to transform respiratory syncytial virus prevention for babies
Nature, Published online: 27 September 2023; doi:10.1038/d41586-023-02957-z Drugs that counter RSV infection can safeguard newborns, offering another mode of protection alongside vaccines.
Article Description
Despite passive immunization with palivizumab to select high-risk children under two years of age, the health and economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) remains substantial. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of immunization programs with new generations of RSV prophylactics, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies (LAMA) and maternal vaccines, in terms of reducing hospitalizations in Nunavik, a Canadian Arctic region. We developed an agent-based model of RSV transmission and parameterized it with the demographics and burden of RSV in Nunavik, Québec. We compared various immunization strategies, taking into account the costs associated with program delivery and calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained as a measure of effectiveness. Scenario analyses included immunization with palivizumab and LAMA for infants under one year of age, and maternal vaccination in mild, moderate, and severe RSV seasons. Data were analysed from November 1, 2019 to May 1, 2021. We found that a Nunavik pilot program with palivizumab which included healthy full-term infants aged 0–2 months in addition to those considered high-risk for complicated RSV disease is not cost-effective, compared to offering palivizumab only to preterm/chronically ill infants under 1 year of age. Using LAMA as prophylaxis produces ICER values of CAD $39,414/QALY (95% Credible Interval [CrI]: $39,314–$40,017) in a mild season (moderately cost-effective) and CAD $5,255/QALY (95% CrI: $5,222–$5,307) in a moderate season (highly cost-effective). LAMA was a dominant (cost-saving with negative incremental costs and positive incremental effects) strategy in a severe RSV season. Maternal vaccination combined with immunization of preterm/chronically ill infants 3–11 months was also a dominant (cost-saving) strategy in all seasons. The switch from palivizumab in RSV immunization programs to new prophylactics would lead to significant savings, with LAMA being an effective strategy without compromising benefits in terms of reducing hospitalizations. This work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Public Health Agency of Canada through the Canadian Immunization Research Network.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537021004211; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101141; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122798999&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622186; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537021004211; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101141
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know