A low-cost amperometric sensor for the combined state-of-charge, capacity, and state-of-health monitoring of redox flow battery electrolytes
Energy Conversion and Management: X, ISSN: 2590-1745, Vol: 14, Page: 100188
2022
- 19Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We recently introduced an amperometric, temperature-independent, and calibration-free method for the measurement of the state-of-charge (SOC) of redox flow battery (RFB) electrolytes. In the study at hand, the measurement accuracy of the method is re-evaluated and significantly improved. The absolute root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) is reduced from ∼ 5% to below 0.5% over the complete SOC range. Based on this enhanced measurement accuracy, a new approach for the online co-estimation of an electrolyte’s capacity and its state-of-health (SOH) is proposed and experimentally evaluated. In an operating RFB, relative RMSDs of 0.7 and 1.4% are obtained for the capacities of the catholyte and the anolyte, respectively. Utilizing this capacity measurement, SOH values with absolute RMSDs between 0.6 and 2.1% can be achieved. Furthermore, a low-cost microcontroller-based measurement unit (MMU) prototype was constructed and characterized. Based on the component prices and possible cost optimizations, total material costs of below 40 EUR ($49) for two MMUs are calculated. In addition, a preliminary investigation of a low-cost bipolar, backfilled microelectrode (BBME) for material costs of below 2 EUR ($2) is presented, its working principle demonstrated, and pathways for mitigating its stability issues are discussed. The methodological enhancements proposed in this study result in unprecedented measurement accuracies for the simultaneous SOC and SOH monitoring of both electrolytes in an operating RFB. The improved amperometric method stands out for its wide applicability, viable implementation costs, temperature as well as concentration independence, and excellent accuracy level. It, thus, has the potential to facilitate the RFB electrolyte development, improve the operational safety of RFBs, and optimize their operational performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174522000113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100188; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124030083&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590174522000113; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100188
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know