Arsenic in stream waters is bioaccumulated but neither biomagnified through food webs nor biodispersed to land
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, ISSN: 0147-6513, Vol: 139, Page: 132-138
2017
- 23Citations
- 84Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef18
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
Article Description
Human activities such as mining have contributed substantially to the increase of metals in aquatic environments worldwide. These metals are bioaccumulated by aquatic organisms and can be biomagnified along trophic webs. The dispersal of contaminants from water to land has been little investigated, even though most aquatic invertebrates in streams have aerial stages. We used field and laboratory approaches to investigate the effects of arsenic pollution on stream invertebrate assemblages, and its bioaccumulation, biomagnification and trophic transfer from aquatic to terrestrial environments by emergent insects. We conducted the study in an arsenic-impacted stream (40 μg L –1 As at the most polluted site) and a reference stream (0.3 μg L –1 As). Invertebrate abundance and richness were lowest at the most impacted site. Arsenic in biofilm and in invertebrates increased with the arsenic content in the water. The highest arsenic accumulators were bryophytes (1760 μg g –1 ), followed by the biofilm (449 μg g –1 ) and shredder invertebrates (313 μg g –1 ); predators had the lowest arsenic concentration. Insects emerging from water and spiders along streambanks sampled from the reference and the impacted stream did not differ in their body arsenic concentrations. In the laboratory, the shredder Sericostoma vittatum had reduced feeding rates when exposed to water from the impacted stream in comparison with the reference stream (15.6 vs. 19.0 mg leaves mg body mass –1 day –1 ; p<0.05), but they grew faster in the polluted water (0.16±0.04% day –1 vs. 0.05±0.01% day –1, p<0.05). S. vittatum exposed to contaminated stream water accumulated arsenic from food, not through contact with water. We concluded that although arsenic is bioaccumulated, mainly by food ingestion, it is not biomagnified through food webs and is not transported from the aquatic to terrestrial environment when insects leave the stream water.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651317300416; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.035; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85010417125&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129598; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0147651317300416; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.035
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know