In-vitro toxicity assessment of a textile dye Eriochrome Black T and its nano-photocatalytic degradation through an innovative approach using Mf-NGr-CNTs-SnO 2 heterostructures
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, ISSN: 0147-6513, Vol: 243, Page: 113985
2022
- 30Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef14
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
The present study aimed to assess the in-vitro toxicity of a popular azodye, Eriochrome Black T (EBT) which may be an environmental hazard causing water pollution if released by textile industries as waste effluents to nearby water ponds. We explored the toxic potential of EBT at 200, 400 and 800 μg/ml concentrations, which were selected based on quantification of EBT present in the pond water near carpet industries. We investigated the permeability of EBT across the organ barriers and found it to be 6.48 ± 0.44% at the highest concentration. EBT also showed up to 26.46 ± 0.533% hemolytic potential on human RBCs. MTT assay revealed toxicity of up to 64.9 ± 10.12%. A dose-dependent increase in intracellular ROS levels and Caspase 3/7 activity was observed and confocal microscopy also demonstrated a similar trend of cellular apoptosis indicating ROS mediated induction of apoptosis as a mechanism of EBT induced cytotoxicity. After establishing the toxicity of EBT, an innovative nano-photocatalytic approach for dye remediation was applied by using as synthesized Mf-NGr-CNTs-SnO 2 heterostructures. This catalyst showed dye degradation potential of up to 82% in 2 h in the presence of sun light. The degraded dye products were tested to have up to 30% reduced cellular toxicity as compared to the parent compound. This work successfully establishes the toxicity of EBT along with devising an innovative approach towards dye degradation where the catalyst is adhered on melamine foam and not being mixed in the effluents directly, thereby, reducing the possibility of catalyst being leached out into the river water.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651322008259; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113985; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136245623&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36027712; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0147651322008259; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113985
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know