Assessment of soil fertility degradation affected by mining disturbance and land use in a coalfield via machine learning
Ecological Indicators, ISSN: 1470-160X, Vol: 125, Page: 107608
2021
- 34Citations
- 122Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The degradation of soil fertility in mining areas poses great risks to agricultural production and the ecological environment, and has increasingly become a worldwide concern. In this study, soil assessments were conducted to evaluate the spatial and temporal variations of soil fertility indicators and characteristics of soil fertility degradation under different types of land use and mining disturbances in a coalfield on the Loess Plateau of China, where soil fertility degradation caused by mining activities has become a serious environmental issue. Soil samples (depth: 0–20 cm) were collected twice from the same 50 sampling points in 2017 and 2019. The sampling points covered three land use types (cropland, shrubland, and grassland) and three years of mining disturbance (2011, 2013, and 2016). Soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), soil-available phosphorus, soil-available potassium, and the fine soil particles in topsoils were measured for each sample. The spatial distributions of the properties and degradation of soil fertility were analysed using kriging interpolation, and the degree to which fertility degraded was analysed via density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and validated using SoftMax and random forest algorithms. The study revealed that the intensity of the degradation of soil fertility could be classified into three clusters (i.e. severely degraded, moderately degraded, and slightly degraded), as indicated by the DBSCAN results, and based on the variation in soil fertility indicators. Validation using random forest and SoftMax suggested that the accuracy of clustering was over 95%. Land use types and coal mining years significantly affected the degree of degradation, and total nitrogen and soil organic matter had the most noticeable impacts on the classification of soil fertility degradation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002739; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107608; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102899086&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X21002739; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107608
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know