Effect of biotic dependencies in species distribution models: The future distribution of Thymallus thymallus under consideration of Allogamus auricollis
Ecological Modelling, ISSN: 0304-3800, Vol: 327, Page: 95-104
2016
- 10Citations
- 95Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Climate change will impact the riverine environment of aquatic organisms. However, most studies focus solely on environmental characteristics to evaluate future distribution shifts. Here, we analyse current and future distribution of the freshwater fish species Thymallus thymallus in relation to the caddisfly Allogamus auricollis. Current and future distributions of the two species were evaluated by a consensus model approach integrating seven different distribution model techniques and testing the effect of considering biotic dependence. Predictions for future distributions were calculated on the basis of the most recent representative concentration pathways (RCPs) of the IPCC for the period of the 2050s. Habitat loss and gain, distribution congruence and altitudinal shift between the two species were quantified on the basis of a full river network. The model considering biotic dependence identified the caddisfly as important variable for the distributions of European grayling, mitigating the drastic effects of climate change. Habitat loss of the grayling was attenuated by considering the distribution of the caddisfly in the distribution modelling. Strong temperature increases as well as run-off decreases led to largest habitat loss of both species (up to 70%). Our combined approach highlighted that the consideration of biotic dependencies in climate change studies improves the understanding for potential future changes of distribution patterns.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016000296; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84958978306&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304380016000296; https://zenodo.org/record/557211; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know