An exploration of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) factors simulated by SCOPE for capturing GPP across vegetation types
Ecological Modelling, ISSN: 0304-3800, Vol: 472, Page: 110079
2022
- 6Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been regarded as proxy data of vegetation photosynthesis; thus, it is assimilated into the terrestrial carbon cycle modeling. The Soil Canopy Observation of Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model is one of the most utilized models of SIF simulation. However, the currently incomplete understanding of SCOPE SIF factors and the lack of exploring how SCOPE works under different vegetation types would deteriorate further carbon cycle research. Herein, this study disentangled decisive SIF factors in the SCOPE model; then, a sample SIF dataset (SynSIF), with spatial resolutions of both 0.02 ∘ and 0.05 ∘, was simulated through SCOPE model using factors above. Then this study validated how far SCOPE simulating SIF could capture GPP, compared with other SIF datasets. The results showed that: (1) There are five decisive SIF factors in SCOPE model, including plant status (leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index) and meteorological parameters (incoming shortwave radiation, air temperature, and atmospheric vapor pressure). (2) The linear relationship of SynSIF-GPP outachieved other SIF datasets across all six vegetation types in southern South America, Asia, and Africa, improving R2 averagely by 0.33, 0.28, and 0.15, respectively. (3) SynSIF in Oceania and Europe, revealing GPP better in shrublands (with SynSIF-GPP R2 increasing by 0.15 and 0.16, respectively) and grasslands (with SynSIF-GPP coefficients increasing by 0.14 and 0.06, respectively), illustrated spatially complementary characteristics with GOSIF across varying vegetation types. Thus, we anticipate that this study could provide more complete information for SCOPE simulating SIF in different biome research when estimating the terrestrial carbon cycle.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001843; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110079; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136544724&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304380022001843; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110079
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know