How much is enough? Optimizing beehive stocking densities to maximize the production of a pollinator-dependent crop
Ecological Modelling, ISSN: 0304-3800, Vol: 498, Page: 110891
2024
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Animal pollination is essential to guarantee the economic viability of pollination-dependent crops, and honeybees ( Apis mellifera L.) play a central role as the most used species worldwide for pollination service management. Despite its importance, recommendations on honeybee hive stocking density are based on rules of thumb that assume hives as standardized units and do not consider the contingencies of the crop's pollen deposition demand. We developed a mechanistic simulation model to assess the consequences of variant hive quality and stocking density scenarios for blueberry productivity per hectare. To do so, we used Bayesian models, field experiments and secondary information to parametrize the simulation and estimate flower visitation rate, pollen deposition, and fruit production at the crop level. We found that maximizing pollen deposition at the crop level can be achieved with seven high quality-hives ha −1 (20000 bees colony −1 ), whereas reaching similar levels of pollination with conventional hives (10000 bees colony −1 ) would require 20 hives ha −1. Also, optimal hive stocking densities to maximize blueberry yield ha −1 needs four high quality-hives ha −1, whilst similar levels of productivity could be reached with 20 conventional colonies ha −1. From an economic and productive perspective, a lower unit rental price for conventional hives compensates for the use of less, but more expensive, high quality hives. Therefore, deciding using either low or high-quality hives should be based on, for instance, the logistic implications of using ∼2.5 more hives ha −1 and the consequences of using colonies with a poorer sanitation state for pollination service stability. Our work set the basis for a more biological and evidence-based protocol for honeybee hive management in blueberry crops. Indeed, integrating honeybee and blueberry pollination ecology, we provide a pragmatic approach to maximize crop productivity based on the minimum beehive stocking densities that optimize pollen deposition and crop yield ha −1 depending on hive's quality. Knowing such a minimum allows for reduced operation costs for farmers, lower uncertainty of pollinators contribution to crop productivity and the risk of undesirable pollination scenarios, and helps to limit the potential negative impacts of saturating ecosystems with honeybees.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know