Performance of sorting grids on catching elasmobranchs in a multispecies Mediterranean bottom trawl fishery
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, ISSN: 0272-7714, Vol: 296, Page: 108594
2024
- 2Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Elasmobranchs are among the most threatened long-lived marine species in the Mediterranean Sea. Incidental catch and intense fishing effort are considered the major threats to their conservation. To date, no Mediterranean countries has adopted specific technical measures within current conservation plans to mitigate potential impacts on vulnerable elasmobranchs. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of new elasmobranch bycatch reducing devices (BRD) in a Mediterranean multispecies bottom trawl fishery (northern central Adriatic Sea, one of the most exploited basins in the Mediterranean). Specifically, two types of grids were tested: a novel shark excluder device (SED) and a flexible grid (Flexgrid). Effectiveness was evaluated in terms of bycatch and commercial catch reduction, relying on the different sizes of elasmobranchs and the main commercial species. Results showed that preliminary tests with SED were effective in excluding elasmobranch species. Catches made with this grid showed no significant difference for targeted crustacean (mantis shrimp, Squilla mantis ), however, commercial losses were shown for some large bony fish. Flexgrid did not affect the catches of the main target species, such as the red mullet ( Mullus barbatus ), European hake ( Merluccius merluccius ) and mantis shrimp, but also retained small-spotted catshark ( Scyliorhinus canicula ). The effectiveness of the grids apparently was affected by the small size of the elasmobranchs captured. The study showed that SED and Flexgrid are valuable solutions for elasmobranchs if combined with other conservation measures (e.g. seasonal fishing closure in critical areas and good practices). Finally, strong cooperation between fishers, scientists, and managers is critical to identify the best management options in a regulatory framework where only a few elasmobranch species are formally protected. Interestingly, the study also yielded the identification of two potential aggregation-nursery areas for the small-spotted catshark ( Scyliorhinus canicula ) and the common smooth-hound ( Mustelus mustelus ).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771423003840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108594; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185977821&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272771423003840; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108594
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know