Seismic Modelling: 4D Capabilities for CO 2 Injection
Energy Procedia, ISSN: 1876-6102, Vol: 114, Page: 3432-3444
2017
- 3Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper focuses on modelling the seismic response to a theoretical CO 2 injection into the upper reservoir at the Longyearbyen CO 2 Lab site in Svalbard, Norway. The modelling aims to assess the monitoring potential of a carbon capture and storage site. We demonstrate the effect of reservoir porosity and CO 2 concentration on seismic reflection amplitudes using a prestack depth migration simulator. In addition, we look at five different CO 2 plumes of increasing volume and model the seismic response as a proxy to monitoring the evolution of a CO 2 plume. We show that even low porosity reservoirs (2%) will generate a significant seismic response from the injection of CO 2, and that low CO 2 concentrations will also be detected. However, further increases in the CO 2 concentration will not be as simple to monitor, with the CO 2 contact providing the best seismic imaging potential. Furthermore, we demonstrate how illumination angle and hence seismic acquisition design is critical to avoid imaging artefacts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610217316685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1474; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029652205&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610217316685; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1474
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know