Synergistic evaluation methodology for pollution and carbon reduction in the field of solid waste resource utilization
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, ISSN: 0195-9255, Vol: 108, Page: 107604
2024
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Article Description
China is currently facing two major strategic tasks: fundamentally improving the ecological environment and achieving carbon peaking and neutrality goals. Solid waste resource utilization not only can avoid environmental problems caused by end-of-life disposal but can also effectively reduce the ecological damage and greenhouse gas emissions during the extraction and manufacture of virgin resources. Theoretically, it offers the dual benefits of pollution reduction and carbon emissions mitigation. However, existing quantitative research on synergistic evaluation of pollution and carbon reduction is primarily focused on the atmospheric field, lacking theoretical support for the solid waste sector. This study constructs a methodology for synergistic evaluation in the solid waste sector, and applies it to typical cases of copper tailings. The results confirm the synergistic benefits of pollution and carbon reduction through solid waste resource utilization. This study not only provides a methodological basis for conducting synergistic evaluations of pollution and carbon reduction in the field of solid waste but also offers insights for China to promote synergistic efficiency in pollution and carbon reduction under the construction of ‘Zero-Waste city’.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524001914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107604; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198834201&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195925524001914; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107604
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know