The future of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer
European Journal of Cancer, ISSN: 0959-8049, Vol: 92, Page: 54-68
2018
- 101Citations
- 224Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations101
- Citation Indexes100
- 100
- CrossRef74
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures224
- Readers224
- 224
Review Description
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Despite the extensive use of mammography as the gold standard for BC screening, the occurrences of false-positive and false-negative mammograms, as well as overdiagnosis, remain a concern in breast oncology. Thus, there is a need to identify reliable biomarkers from an easily accessible source that could generate cost-effective assays feasible for routine screening. Blood-based biomarkers may offer an alternative non-invasive strategy to improve cancer screening. Although none of the currently used blood-based biomarkers are sensitive enough for the early detection of BC, a plethora of significant findings pertaining to the development of screening tools using blood-based biomarkers have emerged in recent years. Promising candidate biomarkers such as proteins, autoantibodies, miRNAs, nucleic acid methylation, metabolites and lipids have shown great potential for detecting BC, including detection at the pre-invasive and early stages of the disease. Nevertheless, blood-based biomarkers for BC screening are still at the early phases of development, and various clinical and preclinical issues need to be addressed before these biomarkers can be used clinically. This review summarises the latest discoveries for harnessing blood-based biomarkers as novel BC screening tools, as well as discusses the limitations and challenges that need to be overcome before the translation of their use from the bench to the bedside.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804918300029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.025; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041476721&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29413690; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804918300029; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.025
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know