PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

First-line mFOLFOX plus cetuximab followed by mFOLFOX plus cetuximab or single-agent cetuximab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Phase II randomised MACRO2 TTD study

European Journal of Cancer, ISSN: 0959-8049, Vol: 101, Page: 263-272
2018
  • 67
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 80
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 16
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    67
  • Captures
    80
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1
  • Social Media
    16
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      16
      • Facebook
        16

Most Recent News

Efficacy and Safety of Maintenance Therapy Using Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Study

Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and second most lethal cancer type worldwide. CRC was estimated to cause 935,000 deaths worldwide in

Article Description

This multicentre, randomised, and phase II study evaluated mFOLFOX+cetuximab followed by maintenance mFOLFOX+cetuximab or single-agent cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (NCT01161316). Previously, untreated mCRC patients (wild-type  KRAS ) were randomised to receive cetuximab+mFOLFOX-6 (8 cycles for 2 weeks) followed by maintenance therapy: single-agent cetuximab (Arm-A) or mFOLFOX-6 + cetuximab (Arm-B) until progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 9 months. One hundred ninety-three patients (median [range] age 60 [33–74] years) were randomised (2:1): 129 Arm-A versus 64 Arm-B. PFS at 9 months (95% confidence interval) showed non-inferiority between arms (Arm-A/Arm-B: 60 [52, 69]%/72 [61, 83]%, p [non-inferiority]<0.1). There were no statistically significant differences in the PFS (Arm-A/Arm-B: 9 [95% CI 7, 10] months/10 [7,13] months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19 [0.80, 1.79]) or overall survival (23 [19, 28] months/27 [18, 36] months, HR = 1.24 [0.85, 1.79]) between arms. The objective response rate was also similar (48 [39, 57]%/39 [27, 52]%). The safety profile was similar between arms, and all patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) (Arm-A/Arm-B grade ≥III AEs: 70%/68%). The most common grade ≥III AEs were as follows: neutropenia (Arm-A/Arm-B: 28%/26%), rash acneiform (15%/24%) and sensory neuropathy (2%/15%) in any group. Arm-A was associated with less grade ≥III rash and sensory neuropathy and a lower rate of serious AEs (20%/27%). This phase II exploratory trial with a non-inferiority design suggests that maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab following mFOLFOX+cetuximab induction could be a valuable option compared with mFOLFOX+cetuximab treatment continuation. We await phase III trials to confirm single-agent cetuximab as maintenance therapy in mCRC patients.

Bibliographic Details

Aranda, E; García-Alfonso, P; Benavides, M; Sánchez Ruiz, A; Guillén-Ponce, C; Safont, M J; Alcaide, J; Gómez, A; López, R; Manzano, J L; Méndez Ureña, M; Sastre, J; Rivera, F; Grávalos, C; García, T; Martín-Valadés, J I; Falcó, E; Navalón, M; González Flores, E; Ma García Tapiador, A; Ma López Muñoz, A; Barrajón, E; Reboredo, M; García Teijido, P; Viudez, A; Cárdenas, N; Díaz-Rubio, E; Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)

Elsevier BV

Medicine; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know