Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic melanoma, a systematic review and meta-analysis
European Journal of Cancer, ISSN: 0959-8049, Vol: 158, Page: 191-207
2021
- 23Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef21
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Review Description
: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker in melanoma. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore its clinical utility as a prognostic, pharmacodynamic (PD) and predictive biomarker. A systematic search was conducted from Jan 2015 to April 2021, of the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE to identify studies. Studies were restricted to those published in English within the last 5 years, evaluating ctDNA in humans in ≥10 patients. Survival data were extracted for meta-analysis using pooled treatment effect (TE), i.e. log hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding standard error of TE for progression-free survival or overall survival differences in patients who were ctDNA positive or negative. PRISMA statement guidelines were followed. A meta-analysis of 19 studies grouped according to methodology of ctDNA detection, revealed a combined estimate for HR of progression-free survival (13 studies using droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) methodology (N = 1002) of 2.10 (95% CI: 1.71–2.59) revealing a poorer prognosis when ctDNA was detected. This result was confirmed in the smaller analysis of (non-ddPCR, N = 347) five studies: HR = 2.45 (95% CI: 1.29–4.63). Similar findings were found in the overall survival analysis of nine studies (ddPCR methodology, N = 841) where the combined HR was 2.78 (95% CI: 2.21–3.49) and of the five studies (non-ddPCR methodology, N = 326) where the combined HR was 2.58 (95% CI: 1.74–3.84). Serial ctDNA levels on treatment showed a pharmacodynamic role reflecting response or resistance earlier than radiological assessment. : Circulating tumour DNA is a predictive, prognostic and PD biomarker in melanoma. Technical standardisation of assays is required before clinical adoption.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804921006158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118361797&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757258; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804921006158; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know