Can Anti-Müllerian Hormone levels predict future pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss?
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, ISSN: 0301-2115, Vol: 284, Page: 20-23
2023
- 1Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels have been shown to be lower among women who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) compared with the general population. However, it is unclear whether it can predict livebirth. This study aims to determine whether AMH can predict the likelihood of a livebirth in women with RPL. Prospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of women undergoing investigation for RPL in a tertiary referral centre over a seven year period (August 2014 -December 2021). Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-square models and logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age and previous livebirth. Exclusion criteria for the regression analysis included abnormal parental karyotype and abnormal pelvic ultrasound scan. Pregnancy outcome was defined as livebirth or further pregnancy loss. There were 488 women who underwent investigation of RPL during the study period. Of these, 65.2% (n = 318) conceived following attendance at the clinic. The majority of these women (69.4%, n = 221) proceeded to have a livebirth. There were no differences in median AMH levels between the livebirth group and the further pregnancy loss group (11 pmol/L vs 9 pmol/L respectively (p = 0.083). AMH did not affect clinical pregnancy rates (p = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.99 [0.98, 1.01]) or pregnancy outcome (p = 0.30, 95% CI = 1.01 [0.99, 1.04]). Abnormal pelvic ultrasonography (p = 0.04) and an abnormal parental karyotype (p = 0.04) were associated with an increased likelihood of a subsequent pregnancy loss. Although AMH levels may have some utility in counselling of some couples with RPL, these contemporaneous data indicate that low AMH does not negatively influence subsequent pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211523000854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150049146&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36924658; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301211523000854; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know