Frailty and pelvic organ prolapse: Colpocleisis with or without hysterectomy as a treatment modality in elderly patients
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, ISSN: 0301-2115, Vol: 306, Page: 2-5
2025
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
The rising prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the aging population underscores the need to reevaluate treatment options. This study examines obliterative procedures, specifically colpocleisis performed with (CH) and without (C) concomitant vaginal hysterectomy, as management strategies for frail, non-sexually active elderly patients with advanced prolapse. This retrospective study analyzed data from patients who underwent either colpocleisis with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy (CH) or colpocleisis alone (C) at our institution between 2006 and 2020. Data were extracted from medical records to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes. In addition, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and analgesic consumption during hospitalization were documented. A total of 120 patients were included, with 48 undergoing CH and 72 undergoing C. The mean age was 74.5 ± 6.3 years. Patients in the C group were significantly older than those in the CH group (76.65 ± 6 vs. 71.3 ± 5.3 years, respectively; p < 0.0001). Ischemic heart disease (IHD) was significantly more prevalent in the C group (54.2 %) compared to the CH group (16.7 %, p < 0.0001). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the C group (3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 4.07 ± 2 days, respectively; p = 0.001). Perioperative complications were infrequent and not significantly different between the two groups. Pain VAS scores on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the CH group (5.0 ± 1.5 vs. 3.0 ± 1.2, p < 0.0001), as was total postoperative analgesic use (p < 0.0001). Both CH and C are well-tolerated for managing advanced POP in the elderly. However, the addition of vaginal hysterectomy is associated with increased pain, greater analgesic consumption, and longer hospital stay. These findings suggest that colpocleisis may be preferable for select frail elderly patients to minimize postoperative discomfort and recovery time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524007255; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.051; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85214316568&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39787960; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301211524007255
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know