No-wait flowshop scheduling problem with two criteria; total tardiness and makespan
European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN: 0377-2217, Vol: 269, Issue: 2, Page: 590-601
2018
- 54Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We consider the m-machine no-wait flowshop scheduling problem with respect to two performance measures; total tardiness and makespan. Our objective is to minimize total tardiness subject to the constraint that the makespan is not larger than a given value. We develop dominance relations and propose an algorithm, called Algorithm AA, which is a combination of simulated annealing and insertion algorithm. Moreover, we adapt five existing algorithms, including three well performing algorithms known to minimize total tardiness, to our problem. We conduct extensive computational experiments to compare the performance of the proposed Algorithm AA with the existing algorithms under the same CPU times. We also evaluate the effect of the dominance relations. The computational analysis indicates that the proposed Algorithm AA performs significantly better than the existing algorithms. Specifically, the relative error of the Algorithm AA is about 60% less than that of the best algorithm among the five existing algorithms considered. All the results are statistically verified. Hence, the proposed Algorithm AA is recommended for the considered problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717310822; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.070; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043243161&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221717310822; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0377221717310822?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0377221717310822?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.070
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know