Quadratic regularization of bilevel pricing problems and application to electricity retail markets
European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN: 0377-2217, Vol: 313, Issue: 3, Page: 841-857
2024
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We consider the profit-maximization problem solved by an electricity retailer who aims at designing a menu of contracts. This is an extension of the unit-demand envy-free pricing problem: customers aim to choose a contract maximizing their utility based on a reservation bill and multiple price coefficients (attributes). A basic approach supposes that the customers have deterministic utilities; then, the response of each customer is highly sensitive to price since it concentrates on the best offer. A second classical approach is to consider logit model to add a probabilistic behavior in the customers’ choices. To circumvent the intrinsic instability of the former and the resolution difficulties of the latter, we introduce a quadratically regularized model of customer’s response, which leads to a quadratic program under complementarity constraints (QPCC). This allows to robustify the deterministic model, while keeping a strong geometrical structure. In particular, we show that the customer’s response is governed by a polyhedral complex, in which every polyhedral cell determines a set of contracts which is effectively chosen. Moreover, the deterministic model is recovered as a limit case of the regularized one. We exploit these geometrical properties to develop a pivoting heuristic, which we compare with implicit or non-linear methods from bilevel programming, showing the effectiveness of the approach. Throughout the paper, the electricity retailer problem is our guideline, and we present a numerical study on this application case.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723003508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85160050099&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221723003508; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know