Review-based recommendation under preference uncertainty: An asymmetric deep learning framework
European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN: 0377-2217, Vol: 316, Issue: 3, Page: 1044-1057
2024
- 3Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Online reviews are one of the most trusted resources for inferring customer needs and understanding consumer decision-making behavior. This study attempts to integrate textual reviews and user-item ratings to improve recommendation performance. To achieve this goal, we propose a deep neural network model. Specifically, the proposed model applies a review-level aggregation strategy to learn user preferences while using an aspect-based document-level aggregation strategy to learn item representation. In this process, we introduce two attention modules at the review and aspect levels, respectively. The review-level attention is used to learn the user preferences that are most related to the target item. The aspect-level attention attempts to learn the item's aspect features that users are most concerned about. In addition, we design a latent stochastic attention mechanism based on the probabilistic generative mechanism, to model the user preference uncertainty. For evaluation, we conduct extensive experiments on several real-world datasets. Using several state-of-the-art methods as comparisons, we find that the proposed model can significantly improve rating predictive power in the context of the recommendation system. Based on ablation experiments, we find that the enhanced predictive power benefits from the preference uncertainty and the attention mechanism. From the qualitative analysis, we suggest that the proposed model can yield many interpretable results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400081X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85184607026&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037722172400081X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know