Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays: Potential for use in minimally-invasive lithium monitoring
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, ISSN: 0939-6411, Vol: 102, Page: 123-131
2016
- 83Citations
- 138Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations83
- Citation Indexes83
- 83
- CrossRef67
- Captures138
- Readers138
- 138
Article Description
We describe, for the first time, hydrogel-forming microneedle (s) (MN) arrays for minimally-invasive extraction and quantification of lithium in vitro and in vivo. MN arrays, prepared from aqueous blends of hydrolysed poly(methyl-vinylether-co-maleic anhydride) and crosslinked by poly(ethyleneglycol), imbibed interstitial fluid (ISF) upon skin insertion. Such MN were always removed intact. In vitro, mean detected lithium concentrations showed no significant difference following 30 min MN application to excised neonatal porcine skin for lithium citrate concentrations of 0.9 and 2 mmol/l. However, after 1 h application, the mean lithium concentrations extracted were significantly different, being appropriately concentration-dependent. In vivo, rats were orally dosed with lithium citrate equivalent to 15 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg lithium carbonate, respectively. MN arrays were applied 1 h after dosing and removed 1 h later. The two groups, having received different doses, showed no significant difference between lithium concentrations in serum or MN. However, the higher dosed rats demonstrated a lithium concentration extracted from MN arrays equivalent to a mean increase of 22.5% compared to rats which received the lower dose. Hydrogel-forming MN clearly have potential as a minimally-invasive tool for lithium monitoring in outpatient settings. We will now focus on correlation between serum and MN lithium concentrations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641116300856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.03.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84960472581&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969262; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0939641116300856; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.03.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know