The role of astrocytic γ-aminobutyric acid in the action of inhalational anesthetics
European Journal of Pharmacology, ISSN: 0014-2999, Vol: 970, Page: 176494
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Inhalational anesthetics target the inhibitory extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptors. Both neuronal and glial GABA mediate tonic inhibition of the extrasynaptic GABA A receptors. However, the role of glial GABA during inhalational anesthesia remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether astrocytic GABA contributes to the action of different inhalational anesthetics. Gene knockout of monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) was used to reduce astrocytic GABA levels in mice. The hypnotic and immobilizing effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane were assessed by evaluating the loss of righting reflex (LORR) and tail-pinch withdrawal response (LTWR) in MAOB knockout and wild-type mice. Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for LORR, time to LORR, MAC for LTWR and time to LTWR of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane were assessed. Time to LORR and time to LTWR with isoflurane were significantly longer in MAOB knockout mice than in wild-type mice ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively). Time to LORR with 0.8 MAC of sevoflurane was significantly longer in MAOB knockout mice than in wild-type mice ( P < 0.001), but not with 1.0 MAC of sevoflurane ( P= 0.217). MAC for LTWR was significantly higher in MAOB knockout mice exposed to sevoflurane ( P < 0.001). With desflurane, MAOB knockout mice had a significantly higher MAC for LORR ( P = 0.003) and higher MAC for LTWR ( P < 0.001) than wild-type mice. MAOB knockout mice showed reduced sensitivity to the hypnotic and immobilizing effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane. Behavioral tests revealed that the hypnotic and immobilizing effects of inhalational anesthetics would be mediated by astrocytic GABA.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014299924001821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176494; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188180316&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38484926; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0014299924001821; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176494
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know