Development and validation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based survival predictive nomograms for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection: A pilot study
European Journal of Radiology, ISSN: 0720-048X, Vol: 138, Page: 109631
2021
- 10Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef5
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
We aim to develop survival predictive tools to inform clinical decision-making in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). A total of 184 patients who had curative resection and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination for pCCA between January 2010 and December 2018 were enrolled. 110 patients were randomly selected for model development, while the other 74 patients for model testing. Preoperative clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were analyzed. Preoperative clinical predictors were used independently or integrated with radiomics signatures to construct different preoperative models through the multivariable Cox proportional hazards method. The nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS), and the performance of which was evaluated by the discrimination ability, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve. The clinical model (Model clinic ) was constructed based on three independent variables including preoperative CEA, cN stage, and invasion of hepatic artery in images. The model yield the best performance (Model clinic&AP&PVP ) was build using three independent variables, Signature AP and Signature PVP. In training and testing cohorts, the concordance indexes (C-indexes) of Model clinic were 0.846 (95 % CI, 0.735−0.957) and 0.755 (95 % CI, 0.540–969), and Model clinic&AP&PVP achieved C-indexes of 0.962 (95 % CI, 0.905−1) and 0.814 (95 % CI, 0.569−1). Both Model clinic and Model clinic&AP&PVP outperformed the TNM staging system. Good agreement was observed in the calibration curves, and favorable clinical utility was validated using the decision curve analysis for Model clinic and Model clinic&AP&PVP. Two preoperative nomograms were constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-years survival for individual pCCA patients, demonstrating the potential for clinical application to assist decision-making.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2100111X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109631; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102605871&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711571; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0720048X2100111X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109631
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know