Appropriate iMAR presets for metal artifact reduction from surgical clips and titanium burr hole covers on postoperative non-contrast brain CT
European Journal of Radiology, ISSN: 0720-048X, Vol: 141, Page: 109811
2021
- 7Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef4
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
To evaluate suitable iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) presets for titanium neurosurgical clips and burr hole covers (BHCs) on postoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). Twenty-two patients who underwent NCCT after intracranial aneurysmal clipping were included. NCCT images were postprocessed using eight currently available iMAR presets. In each image, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed around clip, BHC, and on parietal lobe as reference. Standard deviation (SD) and attenuation value (HU) were measured in each ROI to obtain artifact index (AI) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). For each iMAR preset, SD, AI, HU, and CNR were compared with those without iMAR for clips and BHCs. Visual assessment around each clip and BHC was performed by two neuroradiologists using three-point visual score (VS) (1 = no apparent, 2 = minor, and 3 = severe artifacts). Among the presets, the neuro-coils preset (iMAR-NC) showed the lowest SD, AI, and VS for clips ( P < 0.001). For BHCs, HU, CNR, and VS with iMAR-NC were significantly higher than those without iMAR ( P < 0.001). SD, AI, and VS with the shoulder implants preset (iMAR-ShI) were significantly lower than those without iMAR for clips ( P = 0.002, 0.002, and P < 0.001, respectively). For BHCs, VS with iMAR-ShI was lowest among the presets ( P = 0.004). Although iMAR-NC reduces metal artifacts from clips, it strengthens artifacts from BHCs. For postoperative NCCT, iMAR-ShI most effectively reduces metal artifacts from both clips and BHCs in a single preset.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X21002928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109811; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107262550&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102563; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0720048X21002928; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109811
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know