Integrating CKD Into US Primary Care: Bridging the Knowledge and Implementation Gaps
Kidney International Reports, ISSN: 2468-0249, Vol: 7, Issue: 3, Page: 389-396
2022
- 20Citations
- 73Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- Captures73
- Readers73
- 73
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
A retrospective multi-site examination of chronic kidney disease using longitudinal laboratory results and metadata to identify clinical and financial risk
Abstract Background A retrospective observational study was conducted at 3 health care organizations to identify clinical gaps in care for patients with stage 3 or
Review Description
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 37 million American adults who experience high rates of cardiovascular events and are at risk of kidney failure and mortality. Routine primary care case finding for CKD with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) should focus on risk conditions, particularly diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. The diagnosis of CKD is associated with many important aspects of care, including patient awareness, patient engagement, and improved implementation of evidence-based interventions. Individualized care that tailors CKD interventions proportional to the adverse outcome risk or the eGFR and uACR heat map is a major challenge for primary CKD care, because the condition is heterogeneous in terms of both the cause and the severity. The coordinated care approach to CKD management is necessary to deploy best practice in chronic disease management that engages the interdisciplinary team. An integrated system supports the time-constrained primary clinician with CKD registry functions, clinical decision support tools, quality improvement initiatives, and payment model incentives to drive reduction in adverse outcomes and containment of expenditures. A CKD population health strategy can be built to address primary care education and implementation gaps from the perspectives of testing, detection of disease, interventions, and coordinated system-integrated care. Registry function and data monitoring of the burden of CKD, delivery interventions, and outcomes are key features. Implementation of the Race-free 2021 CKD-(Epidemiology Collaboration) EPI eGFR reporting recommendations by engaging local nephrology, administrative, clinical laboratory, and health equity leaders should help drive the population health design strategy and the data assessment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024922010920; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.01.1066; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124539473&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257053; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468024922010920; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.01.1066
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know