The Clinical and Pathologic Phenotype of Antibody-Mediated Vascular Rejection Diagnosed Using Arterial C4d Immunoperoxidase
Kidney International Reports, ISSN: 2468-0249, Vol: 7, Issue: 7, Page: 1653-1664
2022
- 4Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The diagnosis of antibody-mediated vascular rejection (AM-VR) should be reliable and accurate. We hypothesized that arterial C4d (C4d art ) immunoperoxidase deposition represents endothelial interaction with antibody. From 3309 consecutive, kidney transplant biopsies from a single center, 100 vascular rejection (VR) cases were compared against rejection without arteritis ( n = 540) and normal controls ( n = 1108). The clinical utility of C4d art for diagnosis and classification of AM-VR was evaluated against an independent reference test. C4d art occurred in 20.4% of acute, 11.0% of subclinical, and 46% of VR episodes. Semiquantitative C4d art score significantly correlated with immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) (rho = 0.500, P < 0.001), peritubular capillary C4d (C4d ptc ), microvascular inflammation, and Banff v scores. Banff v3 arteritis suggested AM-VR. Addition of C4d art to Banff antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) schema increased diagnostic sensitivity for AM-VR from 57.9% to 93.0%, accuracy 74.0% to 92.0%, and specificity 95.4% to 90.2% versus Banff 2019 (using C4d ptc ). Death-censored graft failure was associated with C4d art AM-VR criteria using Cox regression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 4.310, 95% CI 1.322–14.052, P = 0.015). VR was then etiologically classified into AM-VR ( n = 57, including 36 mixed VR) or “pure” (TCM-VR, n = 43). AM-VR occurred within all post-transplant periods, characterized by greater total, interstitial, and microvascular inflammation, arterial and peritubular C4d, DSA levels, and graft failure rates compared with TCM-VR. Mixed VR kidneys had the greatest inflammatory burden and graft loss ( P < 0.001). C4d art is a suggestive biomarker of the humoral alloresponse toward muscular arteries. Inclusion of C4d art into the Banff schema improved its diagnostic performance for detection of AM-VR and etiologic classification of arteritis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024922013754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.097; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131117298&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812292; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468024922013754; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.097
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know