Utility of Routine Post Kidney Transplant Anti-HLA Antibody Screening
Kidney International Reports, ISSN: 2468-0249, Vol: 9, Issue: 5, Page: 1343-1353
2024
- 3Citations
- 1Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures1
- Readers1
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Characteristics of mismatched eplets affecting de novo donor-specific antibody production and antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation
Abstract De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) generation is the most important marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, not all dnDSAs induce AMR. The effects of
Article Description
De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) is a strong biomarker associated with the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss after kidney transplantation. This procedure is expensive; however, systematic annual screening was recommended by some national organ transplant agencies or societies even though its clinical utility was not clearly established. To address this question, we retrospectively assessed the incidence of dnDSA according to the test justification (clinically indicated or systematic) in a cohort of low-immunological risk patients, defined by being nonhuman leukocyte antigen (non-HLA)-sensitized and having no previous kidney transplants. A total of 1072 patients, for whom 4611 anti-HLA tests were performed, were included in the study. During the follow-up period of 8 (interquartile range, IQR: 5–11) years, 77 recipients developed dnDSA (prevalence of 7.2%). Thirty-five of these dnDSAs (45.5%) were detected during the first year posttransplantation. In 95% of patients with dnDSA, an immunizing event was identified in their medical records. dnDSA was detected in 46 of 4267 systematic screening tests (1.08%) performed. Active and chronic AMR were frequently observed in biopsies performed after systematic DSA testing (17.9% and 15.4%, respectively). Our results suggest that the detection by systematic screening of dnDSA in low-immunological risk kidney transplant patients without sensitizing events is a rare event, especially after 1 year. Moreover, in real life, systematic annual screening for dnDSA, seems having a limited impact to detect AMR at an earlier stage compared to patients in whom dnDSA was detected after a clinically indicated test.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024924014839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.1394; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188995345&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38707794; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468024924014839; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.1394
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know