Response of biocurrent conduction to soil microenvironment
Electrochemistry Communications, ISSN: 1388-2481, Vol: 161, Page: 107681
2024
- 3Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
Article Description
The biocurrent generated by soil extracellular electron transfer (EET) partly drives biogeochemical cycles and controls soil quality. However, it is unclear how the soil abiotic and biotic conditions affect the biocurrent conduction. In this study, the response relationship of soil microenvironment and in-situ biocurrent was studied. The results showed that red soil exhibited the optimal electron transfer efficiency, as evidenced by the maximum current density and accumulated charge output, with increments of 56–93 % and 80–2800 %, respectively, compared with the other five types of soils. Soil physicochemical properties were the most important factor on the biocurrent generation, and further the quantity and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter, NH 4 + -N content, and lower pH were predictive indicators for the exoelectrogenic processes of soils. In addition, the high soil biocurrent was likely determined by a complex synergistic network of the transformation of carbon and nitrogen, electroactive bacteria involving the functions of cell wall/membrane and cytochrome enzyme metabolism and transport related EET process. Overall, we provide an insight into the relationship among soil biocurrent conduction, physicochemical properties, bacteria community and metabolic function, and a support for bioelectrochemical technology application.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388248124000249; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107681; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187206676&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1388248124000249; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107681
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know