Development of 1-D multiphysics PEMFC model with dry limiting current experimental validation
Electrochimica Acta, ISSN: 0013-4686, Vol: 320, Page: 134601
2019
- 54Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The limiting current method is an effective in-situ diagnostic tool for studying oxygen transport resistance in a PEM fuel cell. In this study, we present both experimental and modeling results of a PEMFC operating from open circuit voltage to limiting current conditions. Operating conditions are 80∘ C and 64% relative humidity. Pressure is varied from 118 kPa, 151 kPa, 201 kPa and 301 kPa. For each pressure the dry oxygen mole fraction is also varied from 1%, 2%, 3% and 4%. The ratio of porosity to tortuosity and the pressure independent O2 transport resistance used in the newly developed 1-D steady state model are obtained from the in-situ limiting current experiment. The model incorporates non-isothermal heat transfer, convective and diffusive gas transport, electrochemical reaction kinetics, shorting and hydrogen cross over current, effects of land and channel geometry on transport resistance, membrane water balance and proton resistance based on non-linear water content in the membrane. The simulation results are validated by polarization curves and limiting current tests at various operation conditions. This steady state 1-D dry model successfully integrate and implement interactive multiphysics to predict fuel cell performance under dry operating conditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013468619314495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134601; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070058972&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013468619314495; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0013468619314495?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0013468619314495?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134601
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know