Board composition, audit committee characteristics, and R&D expenditure
European Management Journal, ISSN: 0263-2373, Vol: 43, Issue: 1, Page: 115-129
2025
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
We examine the impact of board members’ expertise, chief financial officer (CFO) board membership, and audit committee characteristics on the level of research and development (R&D) expenditure. Using a sample of listed companies from 16 European countries over the period from 2014 to 2020, multivariate regression models and controls for endogeneity, our results show that firms with a CFO who serves as a board member reduce R&D expenditures, while enhanced board expertise has the opposite effect. We also find that audit committee financial expertise is positively associated with the level of R&D spending, while the independence of audit committee members reduces the propensity of firms to exhibit R&D expenditures. These results contribute to the academic and policy debate by offering novel insights into which combinations of corporate governance characteristics are more likely to affect variations in the level of R&D expenditure among firms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001263; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.10.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179792677&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263237323001263; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.10.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know