Erosive-thermal transition in high-flux focused ion beam nanomachining of surfaces
Extreme Mechanics Letters, ISSN: 2352-4316, Vol: 7, Page: 121-125
2016
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Focused ion beams (FIB) are increasingly used for surface modification and fabrication with nanometer scale precision. In FIB, an energetic beam of ions strikes a surface and removes material, a process that is understood to depend upon the properties of the beam (e.g. beam flux, ion energy) and is thought to be due to ion induced sputter erosion. We show that the material removal rate is also strongly affected by the thermal properties of the material, sample temperature, and geometry. Furthermore, we deduce a dimensionless parameter, a ratio of incident power to thermally dissipated power ( QFIB ), which parameterizes a switch of the underlying mechanism of material removal. It predicts with remarkable accuracy a previously overlooked transition from slow erosive material removal to significantly accelerated thermal vaporization material removal. Its critical value explains an observed transition in data covering a range of beam fluxes, ion energies, spot sizes, film thicknesses, materials, ion species, and temperatures. Large-scale parallel molecular dynamics simulations support this transition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235243161630027X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979496901&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235243161630027X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S235243161630027X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S235243161630027X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know