A study on the sensor calibration method using data-driven prediction in VAV terminal unit
Energy and Buildings, ISSN: 0378-7788, Vol: 258, Page: 111449
2022
- 6Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, sensor calibration method using data-driven prediction models are developed to eliminate sensor error in the variable air volume (VAV) system. Indoor sensible loads and indoor carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations, which are the main factors necessary for sensor operation in a VAV system, were predicted using a data-driven model (artificial neural network). Using this prediction model, we developed a method to calibrate the sensor error by using it to derive a system model of the sensor that we want to calibrate. As a result of the performance evaluation of the indoor sensible load prediction model, MBE was −1.8% and Cv(RMSE) was 3.4%. The performance evaluation of CO 2 prediction models showed that MBE was −3.2% and Cv(RMSE) was 5.4%. In verification of sensor calibration method, it was confirmed that the error occurring in the sensor can be corrected through the application and verification of the method and procedure for calibrating the VAV terminal unit sensor using the prediction model. In addition, it was confirmed that the error can be corrected both in the case of a single error (CASE1 ∼ CASE3) in which an error occurs in one sensor and in the case of two or more multiple errors (CASE4 ∼ CASE7). In addition, the calibration of the sensor data was able to solve practical difficulties such as sensor replacement.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778821007337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111449; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122613683&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778821007337; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111449
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know