Optimal insulation backfill depth analysis of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger based on multi-factor orthogonal experiments
Energy and Buildings, ISSN: 0378-7788, Vol: 273, Page: 112414
2022
- 17Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE) coupled with ground source heat pump (GSHP) system has been widely applied in building heating. Insulation backfill is essential for the heat transfer performance of DBHE in colder regions. However, few studies focus on the combined influence of multi-factors on the optimal insulation backfill depth. In this paper, an orthogonal experiment was designed to explore the influence of multi-factors on the optimal insulation backfill depth of DBHE by using a numerical heat transfer model. Sensitivity analysis concluded that heat transfer factors such as inlet flow rate (A), inner pipe thermal conductivity (B), inlet temperature (C), geothermal gradient (D), and pipe depth (E) all affected insulation backfill depth of DBHE, and the comparison order of significance are C > D > B > A > E. An optimal insulation backfill depth exists for different DBHE heat transfer conditions. Compared with no insulation backfill, the average heat extraction of buried pipe under optimal insulation backfill conditions increased by 6.09 kW, with an average growth rate of 8.78 %. In addition, multiple linear regression analysis was utilized to examine the relationship between affecting factors and the optimal insulation backfill depth, based on the findings of orthogonal tests. The outcomes revealed that inlet temperature, inner pipe thermal conductivity, and pipe depth were positively correlated, with the highest standardized positive correlation value of 0.755 for inlet temperature. In contrast, inlet flow and geothermal gradient were negatively correlated, with the highest standardized negative correlation coefficient of −0.420 for the geothermal gradient. The linear regression equation could predict the magnitude of optimal insulation backfill depth with diverse input parameters. The relative error between the predicted and simulated values of the equation was less than 5 %. The findings of this research can guide the popularization and application of the GSHP coupled with the DBHE system in colder regions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822005850; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112414; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136582921&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778822005850; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112414
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know