Pyrolysis-catalysis of different waste plastics over Fe/Al 2 O 3 catalyst: High-value hydrogen, liquid fuels, carbon nanotubes and possible reaction mechanisms
Energy Conversion and Management, ISSN: 0196-8904, Vol: 229, Page: 113794
2021
- 151Citations
- 180Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To understand the correlation between plastic structure and products, and the possible reaction mechanisms, the pyrolysis–catalysis of different types of waste plastics was investigated in the presence of an Fe/Al 2 O 3 catalyst. Polypropylene (PP), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), and general-purpose polystyrene (GPPS) were used as the feedstock. The results showed that PP, HDPE, and LDPE showed higher H 2 -enriched gaseous product yields (>40 wt%), but higher H 2 concentration (over 70 vol%) was obtained from the gaseous products of HIPS and GPPS. In terms of liquid oil, the yield exhibited a relatively stable tendency, which was ~ 20 wt%, and the liquid product comprised hydrocarbons with a carbon number range mainly between 8 and 16. For solid carbon deposits, HIPS waste plastic led to a higher solid deposit yield of 49.4 wt%, followed by GPPS of 48.7 wt%. By contrast, PP, HDPE, and LDPE showed lower yields of 30.2 wt%, 36.9 wt%, and 35.9 wt%, respectively. In summary, more, purer and cleaner carbon nanotubes (CNTs) could be obtained from pyrolysis–catalysis of polyolefin (PP and PE), while more amorphous carbon and hydrogen were gathered from PS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890420313170; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113794; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099208498&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196890420313170; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113794
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know