Techno-economic feasibility analysis of Renewable-fed Power-to-Power (P2P) systems for small French islands
Energy Conversion and Management, ISSN: 0196-8904, Vol: 255, Page: 115368
2022
- 30Citations
- 4Usage
- 67Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef5
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Article Description
In this paper, the feasibility analysis of H2 and Battery based Power-to-Power (P2P) systems are presented from a techno-economic perspective. For this study, 21 small islands of France based in Europe are selected, being naturally endowed with renewable energy sources (RES) of solar and wind. For each island, three distinct energy storage options, i.e., hydrogen storage, battery storage and hydrogen + battery combined storage are discussed and explored. Optimum sizing of RES and P2P systems are achieved through employing particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, keeping Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) as an objective function. The hydrogen and battery storage combination with an average LCOE value of 420Euro/MWh was found to be the most suitable option for all 21 reference islands. The associated Net Present Cost (NPC) was EUR564,388,050 which was lower than that for the other two storage options. The hybrid storage selection necessitated installation of 41 MW of photovoltaic (PV) modules and 122MW of wind turbines at these islands. The required storage capacity comprised of 7700MWh of hydrogen and 7MWh of battery storage combined with the auxiliaries. A considerable emphasis is also laid on highlighting the annual reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and other air pollutants through the adoption of the proposed RES-P2P integrated systems. The annual carbon dioxide equivalent measure (CO 2,e) of all islands was computed to be around 99507.52tons. It was revealed that more than 99 thousand tons of CO 2 emissions can be prevented by avoiding consumption of more than 34 million liters of diesel per year.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890422001649; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115368; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124506903&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196890422001649; https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/4146; https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5155&context=test2021; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115368
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know