Economic dispatch savings in the coal-fired power sector: An empirical study of China
Energy Economics, ISSN: 0140-9883, Vol: 74, Page: 330-342
2018
- 50Citations
- 53Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
China Briefing 15 June 2023: CBAM fight; New energy milestone; Extreme heat
Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing. Carbon Brief handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Snapshot TRADE WARS: China strongly criticised the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which is due to enter force in October. 上微信关注《碳简报》 ‘NEW ENERGY’ PUSH: China’s non-fossil fuel energy sources have surpassed 50% of its total
Article Description
The current equal share dispatch approach has often been criticized for its negative influence on the electricity system operation in China, which worsens the energy security, environmental sustainability and affordability problems. To provide references for the on-going electricity market reform, this study employs an optimization model to quantify the economic dispatch savings in the coal-fired power sector. Key findings are summarized as follows: (1) The heat rates of 2803 coal generators in China range from 273.91 gce/kWh to 348.38 gce/kWh units in 2014, and the great differences among these generators at different geographical areas exhibit the necessity for economic dispatch. (2) 5.67% of the coal used for power generation could be saved from economic dispatch in a provincial level, the monetary value of which can reduce the average electricity price by 0.0058 yuan/kWh in 2014. (3) Three major political and economic challenges hinder the transition from the current dispatch mode to economic dispatch, namely the insufficient running hours for cost recovery, limited cross-border trading due to electricity over-supply and local protectionism, and the political economy problems from generators of different ownership types.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988318302354; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85049305275&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140988318302354; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0140988318302354?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0140988318302354?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know